Posted by
sgtmajorbrad on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12:07:32 PM
No Illegal Aliens: Part 2
A while back I wrote about posting a sign in my front yard
stating, “NO ILLEGAL ALIENS…VOTE AGAINST.” To this sign were the names of the
candidates that refused to answer some innocuous questions about illegal
aliens. Now this is the final week associated with the signs because the runoff
election between Mike Lease and Traci Wilkinson is set for Saturday.
In the time since I placed the large sign I’ve placed what
resembles the old Burma Shave signs. On these signs I’ve made rhymes using
illegal immigration as the subject and the candidate’s refusal to state his
position on the subject. This has been largely ignored until recently.
Two code enforcement individuals, affectionately named
Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb, showed up in front of the house and one was in my
yard taking pictures. I noticed this while sitting at my laptop and went
outside to see what his problem was. My lab, Nixon, came bounding out the door
to greet him. This guy jumps out in the middle of the street and says, “ I can’t
believe you sicked your dog on me…Call the police, Call animal control!” “You
can’t have a dog out here!”, where I replied why not it’s my yard. To make a
long story short animal control and the police show up, determine that the
worst that Tweedle Dee would have received would have been a vicious lick
commenting that this is probably the nicest dog in the neighborhood. Expecting
the subsequent registered letter from the City my neighbor researched the
ordinances and found I was in compliance.
A few days later the police blocked the intersection in
front of my house where I was accused of brandishing a weapon. I replied that I
was showing an antique to friend and if I wanted to start a firefight or
intimidate I had a lot more exotic things than a 100 year old rifle that I
would be afraid to shoot on a good day. They left advising me of the statutes
and my neighbor advised them of the definition of brandishing.
Last night I was interviewed by a student journalist writing
a piece to get into journalism school at Texas Tech. I gave her the background
on the reason for the sign and informative session of how illegal immigration
affects her today. I was accompanied by me neighbors that gave her a civics
lesson on government and why it is so important to research your candidate
prior to your vote. I shared that Teddy Kennedy and John Kerry had to start
somewhere and if you voted for the right candidates you wouldn’t be concerned
with a Chappaquiddick dive instructor who’s students never surface or the like
of a Vietnam
vet that associates and cohorts with the likes of Hanoi Jane Fonda. She left
with a new appreciation of the signs in my yard and promised to share her essay
with me.
Mike finally queried another neighbor of mine asking, “what
is up with that neighbor of yours?” Reuben replied that you need to call him.
Mike sent me a reply to my original email asking that I contact him at my
convenience. I replied that I would be available that evening after 8:00 PM. I received no call. 5 days later I
sent mike this:
It is Sunday and I have yet to get a call from you or an email setting
up a time for discussion. This leads me to believe that you are disingenuous in
actually discussing the questions I sent you. As a matter of fact a phone call
is not necessary... all you had to do is respond to those questions that are
listed below via email. I also must state that at this late time in the runoff
I would find your response suspect; especially when one of your campaign
workers soliciting support for your campaign promised one of my neighbors, who
are also neighbors and friends of Reuben, that you would call them back and
respond to her concerns. To date they haven't received your call.
If you don't get the big picture Mike let me spell it out for you.
Dodging and ignoring constituent questions tells me just what kind of
councilman you would be. We have enough of those kind of politically correct
politicians in government and I'm not willing to support the candidacy of
another whose special interests come before their constituents. If someone was
interested enough to ask questions then someone should have the common courtesy
to respond. You and your fellow cronies are surprised at my response and signs
asking Reuben, "What is up with that neighbor of yours?" But you
haven't sat here and seen the people driving by expressing their support or
their curiosity on what prompted my political signs. I tell them the facts and
I try to get them involved in asking questions instead of judging a candidate
on the color and size of their signs or the tripe you put in to the news papers
as your platform. I'll see you at the runoff election.
I revised my Burma Shave signs with the following:
A tough questioned
asked
Deserves a reply
Traci responded
Mike sits silent and
shy?
A lack of
testosterone
Is something I
dislike
But when it comes to
balls
Traci’s are bigger
than Mike’s
This past weekend I made bed placards for my pickup that
read, “VOTE AGAINST MIKE LEASE.”
It is not that I’m overly thrilled with the other candidate.
Her response barely addressed one of the questions I asked. That is the reason
I’ve taken the position of vote against instead of endorsing the other
candidate.
So when you see John Kerry or Hillary railing against common
sense with their hands stuck in your pockets think back to those local
elections that paved the way to where they are today. If it strikes then how
important these local elections are then get involved and ask the tough
questions to get their response. If you’re like me then No Quote gets No Vote.