Posted by
sgtmajorbrad on Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:53:49 AM
In my youth my friends and I spent a great deal of time eyeing
the young ladies. We came up with all kinds of politically incorrect descriptions
born from the raging levels of testosterone in our body’s chemistry. My favorite
was, “I like her…she has short heels.” Depending on the company I kept at the
time this usually prompted the query, “what do you mean by short heels?” I’d reply,
“She’s apt to fall on her back when she sees money.”
Hillary Clinton is a lightening rod of controversy when it
comes to money. Her substantial but suspicious campaign contributions from waiters,
dishwashers and Asian Criminals reeks of impropriety but little is done to pursue
investigating these contributions let alone prosecute criminal acts. She seems to
squeak by the media’s attention either from having very intimidating friends, an
undeclared clandestine support from their liberal agenda or she says she’ll return
the money in question feigning ignorance. The question is how much has she kept
that no one knows about?
I’ve stated before we have the best government that money
can buy and that goes for the presidential candidates. It is greatly publicized
what the candidates coffers contain in relation to the popularity of the candidate
with the potential voters. I guess we are to assume that more money equals the
best candidate irregardless of the candidate’s views and position on subjects
of national interest. It is also deceiving that the corporate contributions are
supposedly representing the views of the citizens. Face it people the only ones
they represent are those corporations and the favors they expect if their supported
candidate wins!
Hillary was bit recently by the subject of driver’s licenses
for illegal aliens and one would question her motives when 80% of the populous of
New York believes this is stupid idea
and disagrees with this decision. Hillary pulls out the old Potomac
propaganda trick that is verbose but sheds no public commitment on the subject
one way or the other. She is pro-illegal immigrant depending on the audience
but refuses to alienate those same voters that put her in office. Just as crime,
disease and death excludes no one the corporate contributions are indiscriminate
of party affiliation. They can afford to box their bet on win, place and show
while we deal with the aftermath of a short heeled transaction!