About Me

Name: sgtmajorbrad
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Iowa Caucuses?


All of the hoopla and the posturing of the media will come to an end for the Iowans today. Here they will go through some archaic ritual of gathering in groups to support the candidate of their choosing instead of placing a vote on a machine or marking a box on a ballot. It reminds one of a left over secret ritual of medieval times.

For a brief time the Iowans can rest from the onslaught of the political ads and microphones shoved in their faces. The media motor homes will move on to the next State to spew their green house gases in the name of having the best election coverage for their viewers. They’ll still have the cold winter to contend with and the same concerns they had before the candidates arrived but they have one advantage that the other states don’t; they were first.

The Iowans will get to sit back and look at the candidates and see if their positions change from what they were telling them prior to the caucuses and their vote. They’ll see if the candidate is an Oak tree that stands firm on their commitments or a Willow that bends to which ever the prevailing winds blow. They will get that much extra time to revise their selections based on the candidate’s actions prior to the presidential elections. There are advantages to being first in some cases because you can cure the selective amnesia of a candidate or catch them in a lie.

I would admonish the Iowans to send the candidates packing with the message that they are fed up with the status quo and are looking for a government that listens to the people instead of the present administration that listens only to his pocket book!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary: Eat’n ain’t Cheatin?

Don’t you love those British tabloids? No one or nothing is sacred in the British press and with the track record of the Clintons being less than believable when it comes to matters that require honest and truthful answers; a denial does nothing to impeach the accusations. (Impeach: oooh I bet that’s a word that jars old Bill out of his jock strap.)

Hillary is accused of preferring a whisker biscuit instead of the innovative use of a cigar with her aid Huma Abedin. It makes one wonder if Hillary was Bill’s first lady in the Whitehouse. I guess the ghost of Lincoln knows for sure.

Bill has had his share of controversy when it comes to extracurricular activities. Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinski are two that comes to mind when I watch CSI gather DNA evidence. Gennifer even wrote about Hillary’s sexual preference prior to the British tabloids bringing her revelations to light. Is it true? If it is then Chelsea is going to have a hell of a birds and bees speech for her kids.

Are some down and dirty campaign signs on the Horizon? “Hillary: Does it taste like Fish?” 

Hillary can counter Obama? “OBAMA: Medicine Bottle Cotton is there to remind you what your ancestors picked before you did drugs!”

Democracy has really changed. Remember when the electorate held Adlai Stevenson’s divorce against him? If you do then you’re old. It is amazing what we tolerate as the norm today in comparison to our youth. Sometimes I wonder if anything is for the better?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Much for Hillary?

My neighbor sent me an interesting link yesterday to a site that allows the user to query who is donating to a presidential candidate and how much they donated. You can reach this site at Huffington post candidate donations . Find that cook or dishwasher donating $10,000 to a dizzy gash that wants to give amnesty and vacillates on giving driver’s licenses to illegal aliens. See what crooks that Obama wants as neighbors as well as their donations.

The site allows different methods of querying the data and I particular like where you can plug in the employer and see what candidates the CEOs of major corporations are supporting for president. Check and see the drug manufacturer’s support for Obama?

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let’s Protest?

Back on my mother’s birthday of this year two burdens on society became worm food. They met their demise playing catch with the business end of a shot gun wielded by a concerned and protective 61 year old neighbor. Joe Horn is by his neighbor’s accounts is the type of neighbor that most all of us would like to have; so much so that neighbors and friends came from near and far to defend their friend from a gang of activist protestors led by a person named Quanell X. ( I bet you can tell what continent this guy’s ancestors originated from?)

At issue between Joe and these two slime balls was the way they entered his neighbor’s house by breaking a window with a crow bar and removing some of the contents of the neighbor’s home without them being there. Their actions reeked of illegal activity so Joe got a pump handled equalizer in case there was a dispute about the ownership of the items being removed. Buck shot, cordite and smoke resolved their intent to physically communicate their position with Joe.

Joe is not unlike most of the citizens of this nation that believes in the security of his home, his family and his property. Joe is also like most of us that believe his citizen neighbors deserve that protection as well. This is not unlike the argument concerning illegal immigration.

The key word is illegal denoting an act that violates the rule of law. All too often we read of illegal aliens repeating crimes that they have been arrested for numerous times, been let out on bail to disappear back across the border to escape justice or criminally re-enter after being deported with little or no consequence. And as in the case of Joe Horn lock jawed liberal low life activists crawl out from underneath their rocks to make a lot of noise, eat everything in site, defecate and then leave. It is the lack of enforcement of our laws for special interests and politically correct causes that breeds circumstances such as these.

If Miguel Antonio DeJesus, and Diego Ortiz had their legal status revoked when they committed their previous crimes then their countries of origin could have dealt with their continued presence and possibly saved poor Joe from having to defend himself and take another’s life. Poor Joe has to live with taking a life. These memories will haunt him the rest of his days and could have been prevented by bending the tabs of this scum and deporting them. Instead ICE determines the crimes are not severe enough to warrant deportation or they aren’t even referred to ICE for disposition to make that ludicrous decision. We need zero tolerance policies and more police like Joe Arpaio running tent prisons.  We need to revise the passage on the statue of Liberty to say, “Keep your criminals, your diseased, your scum; your lowlifes earning to live for free!” The point of legal immigration is to enrich our society, not to drag it down to the hell hole that many of these animals come from.

People will try to personify Joe as a typical resident of Texas with the mystique of the rough and ready western heritage where law was dispensed from a barrel of a gun and packaged in a body bag. I guess that is not all that bad and the demise of Miguel and Diego guarantees they will no longer reproduce which I guess is even better. But we are no different than anyone else in this country that is fed up with administration’s amnesty agenda causing havoc and harm up close and personal in our own homes. I look for the day real soon when those same protestors defending Joe are in the streets protesting to secure our borders and eliminate illegal immigration.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Evangelical Politicial Endorsements

When someone tells me their criteria for approval of a candidate is that the evangelical crowd has endorsed that person’s candidacy I cringe. I envision the masses of voters abdicating their decision process to those that have only their interests and their pocket books at heart.  My dad taught me that when the preacher preached with his palms up then hide your wallet because he was about to put the bite on your finances. Looking back at some of the TV evangelists and their lavish life style before they fell from grace affirms my dad’s theory. Reverend Bob and his high maintenance wife were a local Dallas example that had quite a fervent following here on the air waves bilking retirees and old ladies out of their life savings. 

I use the same theory when a politician is caught with their hands in the till. The most recent Texas that comes to mind is Tom Delay, the Texas Hammer. There were those that came to Delay’s defense just on the subject alone that he was a good Christian and he was being set up by the liberal left and falsely accused. After he and Abramoff  were caught stuffing their pockets with those illegal donations he resigned from the House and the speaker’s position. I can’t understand why he is not in jail like Abramhoff and no one challenges his public appearances as a criminal in limbo. Resigning in disgrace he squealed: “I am sustained by my lord and savior. When you go through this kind of adversity, I got to tell you, if you know Him and He's on your side, there ain't nothing but joy.” My response to this is, “Did God get his cut?”

For those that want to challenge this assessment of Delay check out Pbs's Capitol Crimes . It is worth the time and is very informative. 

Now while I generally like Chuck Norris his political endorsement of an evangelical candidate holds little weight with me. His persona and popularity has been created by professionals for the silver screen and in that context alone I’m suspicious. I know nothing of Chuck’s reasons for supporting Huckabee other than he represents Chuck’s view of Christian values and opposes abortion. I’m against abortion in a personal choice but who am I to dictate someone else’s decision? Maybe a compromise can be reached in that if you decide to abort your pregnancy you also agree to sterilization at the same time to prevent future abortions. This might put a stringent fear of the consequences of spitting out an unwanted love trophy in relation to abstinence and contraception. If they put Ted Kennedy or Nancy Pelosi as a poster child for abortion I might change my position altogether.

Mike Huckabee might end up as my choice for a presidential candidate but it won’t be because he is a Baptist Minister. I’m a firm believer in the separation of Church and State and don’t want any more wars fought in the name of God. We’re killing kids in Iraq right now because Bush thought it was his divine responsibility to bring democracy to the middle east. I want someone that will enforce our borders and not grant amnesty and special treatment to invading criminals. Judging Huckabee’s recent examples in Arkansas with the building the Mexican consulate at taxpayer expense and giving instate tuition and scholarships to illegal aliens he has a long way to go to convince me that he should be my candidate of choice. 

I’d prefer to make my own decision and accept the responsibility for those decisions instead of becoming a lemming and jumping off an evangelical cliff to satisfy someone else’s opinion of who gets your vote.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

YouTube Boobs?

Last night I watched the greatly advertised Youtube Debate on CNN and to my amazement I actually enjoyed the show.

The main difference between this debate and its predecessor for the Democrats was the selection of the questions. Someone definitely got rid of the gay activist on the selection committee or they remembered that they were playing to the conservative crowd for viewers. The “coming out party” was reserved to a retired weekend warrior brigadier General from, you guessed it, California. He suppressed his sexual orientation during his tenure and now champions the cause for gays in the military. I briefly read this morning that he was a plant from the Clinton camp but haven’t got the specifics to share my views. As brief as the subject was posed to the candidates it was Romney that took it in the rear because of his statements in the past where he played Martin Luther King and said: “ I look to the day where straight men and gay men can walk together and hold each other’s testicles while serving in the military…” Romney tried to hide from his statements by saying he would seek input from his generals and defer to their decision before committing one way or another. The gays better hope that Nathan Bedford Forest isn’t reincarnated in our military. The only thing missing was Larry Craig, Barney Frank and this guy passing out cigars because their boyfriends caught the mumps!

For those that think that the immigration issue isn’t a major concern of the 2008 elections needs to watch this weeks reruns of the debate. It was first on the agenda and drew the most heated responses between the candidates. Tom Tancredo commented that he loved watching the others trying to out Tancredo Tancredo. Romney and Giuliani started launching cruise missiles at each other over their past indiscretions concerning illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities. As hard as Giuliani tried to disclaim New York City wasn’t a sanctuary city he had it rammed back up his butt from most everyone else.

I have to give the Rat RINO John Mc Cain credit for sticking to his Teddy Kennedy principles and not trying to flop on the issue as others have done for political gain. He still would and still will give amnesty along with the sovereignty of this nation to those that have crossed our borders illegally. No one asked him though how he planned to fix social security when he plans on giving it to the illegal aliens?

Mitt Romney did an excellent job defending the anti-illegal immigration views by stuffing Huckabee’s  plan to give preferential treatment to illegal alien children over that of the citizens of this nation. He said you are rewarding criminal acts which silenced Huckabee on the spot.

For those bible thumpers that ignore the concept of the separation of church and state there was the question of if you believe what is written in the Christian Bible? No one had the brass ones to say they would support genocide if done in the name of God, burn Darwin’s books or turn the gay community into a seasoning for a good steak. Nor did anyone criticize Bush’s divine guidance to lie to us about WMDs and the reasons we started a war in Iraq. 

All in all I enjoyed the show and thought it was very entertaining. Did I learn anything new or have I made a decision on the candidate I will support; no. I do think the premise that questions posed by the citizens of this nation need a national forum like this instead of some politically biased and influenced news organization doing it on our behalf. There will always be some conjecture over the selection of the questions asked and I think CNN learned that from the Democratic debate. All in all I think CNN did a fair job and hope they do this again. It is at least one way for the people to ask the question about the subjects that mean the most to them and the candidates be held accountable for their answer.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Choking Chickens in Tyler Texas

Yesterday Karl Rove and John Cornyn attended a conference in Tyler Texas to discuss immigration and illegal immigration with Texas business concerns. Immigration business conference

Fast food proprietors complained that it is not always easy to fill those jobs at fast food restaurants and Pilgrims Pride vice chairman laments our immigration system is broken and needs to be fixed. This comes from the mouth of one of the most offending corporations in employing illegal aliens.

The one thing that all of them failed to address that these business owners are breaking the law. They want amnesty not for the illegal aliens but for themselves because they are complicit in aiding and abetting criminals in our society while prospering from this massive pool of illegal labor. For the fast food consumers how about some hepatitis 3 or drug resistant TB to go along with your order of poly-uncircumcised fat. Who will feign ignorance or deny responsibility for that kid lying in a hospital bed playing with their lead coated happy meal toy coughing up blood. 

John Cornyn makes the statement we need to cool down the rhetoric surrounding the issue. Well Mr. Cornyn you, Pilgrims Pride, this administration and the rest of congress have been choking your chickens since 9/11 and the borders are no more secure today than they have been for the past 30 years. It is time to start listening to some of that rhetoric because we are fed up with your inaction, your clandestine amnesty agenda and your support for a guest worker program when the facts and figures don’t support the need. Are you going to turn into a Rat RINO like Kay Bailey suddenly supporting the Dream act after you are elected? Are you going to forget your commitments like this rotten thieving Governor that vetoes the moratorium on the NAFTA super highway after a super majority of legislators and Texans supported this legislation?

You are up for election this year and the Eyes of Texas are upon you.

 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No Match Rehash?

In the land of fruits and nuts, home of the Pelosi and the 9th circuit court of appeals, there is an issue on hold that may be one of the most logical attempts at enforcing employer compliance with the immigration laws of this nation. This would be the no-match letters going to employers requiring them to have their employees resolve discrepancies with the Social Security Administration.

You would think this subject would be as controversial as heterosexual sex and maybe that is the problem. It’s not anti-gay enough or we didn’t discriminate against the minorities so the ACLU can get on their grand stand and trumpet the egregious actions committed by the government. No they are complaining because it is too comprehensive and inclusive. God forbid that after spending their life’s savings to a smuggler, buying forged identities (including forged or stolen Social Security Numbers), and entering this country illegally might make us actually care about rectifying these discrepancies and enforcing the immigration laws of this nation. No we’re concerned because it might cause some illegal alien their job but we phrase it that it might cause some one here legally their job because of database errors. Here is where the court’s logic escapes me.

A legal employee you think would be concerned because at some time in their life they might want to collect on their social security; especially if they become disabled and are unable to work. The government gives a 90 day grace period to resolve any discrepancies and safe harbor if there is a documented appeal in progress. This sounds fair to me.

Let’s logically look at the database errors. You would think the binary logic validating an invalid social security number would be a no “brainer.” If it isn’t in the database and hasn’t been issued then why are you using this number? “Eets de number I always youse.” When did you apply for a Social Security card? “I dunno, I don’t member.” Where is your birth certificate or documents proving you are entitled to work in the United States. “Ize don’t has them, Ize undocumented.” Where is the first place you worked and who was your employer? “Ize don’t member.” Well without documents, proof you are entitled to work here, an employer you where started your initial employment I can’t resolve this No-match. How old are you? “Ize 19.”

You and 30 other people are using the same Social security number, where were you born. “Inze a hospital.” Where is your birth certificate? “I no gots, Ize undocumented….”

Now showing the spine of a jelly fish the government asks the court to defer a hearing or decision until the spring of this coming year so they may revise and clarify the rules associated with the no match enforcement requirements. This makes as much sense as Ramos and Compean in jail for defending our border but that is what you get for the best government money can buy. I guess the object of this action is to make us more in tune with our gay community by ramming illegal immigration up the citizen’s butts!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ahhhhh Go Jerk your Turkey!!!

With your best Yankee accent you can express your indifference to another persons feelings or opinion by uttering the phrase, “ Ahhhhh Go Jerk your Turkey.” There is nothing particular vulgar about this phrase but one’s imagination runs when seeing someone preparing the turkey for thanksgiving dinner and invariably has to remove that little packet that contains the giblets and the long turkey neck shoved in the cavity where it once resided. Grasped in a closed hand and yelling, “look out…I’ve got a blue vein-er on the loose,” you can almost guarantee you’ll temporarily chase the women from the kitchen earning their contempt and disgust in the process. The origins of this phrase may be a feminine contribution responding to the chef’s antics but few can debate that its use is exclusively to someone’s complete disregard of your opinions.

As of late I have felt its abundant use by this administration, Congress and the presidential candidates. If you don’t believe me then let’s review some incidents of the past.

Does anyone remember the Dubai ports deal where the operation and control of our nation’s ports would be under the control of an Islamic Nation? This is after we buried over 3000 people from the attack on the World Trade Center and the nation expressed its outrage at the mere thought. What did Bush and his cronies say to our objections? Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

How about the Senate’s response to HR4437, the house’s version of immigration enforcement? Get one Teddy Kennedy, one John McCain, add a bunch of the Bush’s Whitehouse and you get Comprehensive Amnesty. What was their response to the outraged citizen’s of this nation? Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

If the initial attempt at Amnesty wasn’t bad enough its phoenix like resurrection again included a Kennedy, a McCain, a Graham calling detractors bigots, a Kyl and a Isakson defying their constituent and party base dreaming up a Grand Amnesty Compromise. What was their response to the nation’s outrage? A couple suddenly seen the light and withdrew their support while the rest said, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

Dream Act, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

Mexican trucks on our highways, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

NAFTA super highway, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

North American Union and SPP, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

Ramos and Compean’s pardon, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

New York driver’s licenses for illegal aliens, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

Candidate support for illegal alien driver’s licenses, “Yes, no, maybe both, oh well… Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

Judicial injunctions on enforcing identity theft of duplicate social security numbers, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

3 billion for increased border security killed in committee after getting 95% approval the previous day, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

Hey Mr. President, when are you going to secure our ports and borders? Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

 Hey Dick, we can’t get the public to buy our ideas of eliminating our sovereignty so let’s get the slopes to reduce our children’s IQ with a little lead!” Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

"We are sorry premier Wen Jiabao, it is the imperialistic habits of our Mattel corporation to erroneously accuse the Chinese of putting a little extra lead in our kid’s pencils. We apologize for our actions and to the American public, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!"

“Just put some Aqua Dots in her drink and tell her they’re very small olives.” Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

The most recent example of blatant disregard is by ICE telling Irving Texas and North Texas don’t bring your illegal aliens here, we’re too busy. By the way, Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

A while back the republican party called me asking for donations. I replied, “Ahhhhh go jerk your Turkey!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NAFTA drug bust

Well as predicted the pilot program of Mexican trucks given free reign to travel the highways of this nation has experienced its first example of criminal activity caught by border patrol agents at the Calexico California border entry.

Border Fire reports that a tractor trailer seeded with big screen TVs and almost 9 tons of pot was apprehended at the crossing. This comes as no surprise to me and I wonder how many more got through the cursory inspection facilities. The only thing missing were the labels indicating NAFTA (Narcotic and Felon Trafficking Association) and the bill of lading indicating George Bush as the consignee.

I still predict that drug ties will link the Bush administration to their incessant attempts to circumvent any securing of our borders. It is no wonder this administration prohibits legal drugs from Canada…it cuts into the illicit profits from Mexico!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Doing the wrong thing about the right issue?

One of the most difficult things to do in life is raise a child. They don’t come with a handbook or owner’s manual, they’ll stick anything in their mouths and worst of all they are living examples of what you taught them. There is no excuse for a parent when a child goes bad because somewhere in his life they either missed the necessary guidance or are the product of the examples shown by the parent.

This morning I received an article that reflected on longing for the old days when crime didn’t pay and hard work did, Mothers staid at home, Husbands were loving and children were polite…etc.

It made me reflect on the ills of today’s society and the guidance we are getting and giving. Take for example crime doesn’t pay. I’m still picking Kiwi and shoe laces from my rear end when in my youth I decided to steal a candy bar from the local drug store. I can still remember that lesson I learned in life close to 50 years ago and although the corporal punishment was severe; it was the disappointment I saw in my dad’s face that engraved an indelible memory. I shared the same respect for doing the right thing with my children and used corporal punishment when necessary to reinforce those values.

Yet today we have Judges legislating from the bench instead of applying the law. It is illegal to enter this country uninvited, use forged identities, provide shelter and employment to these criminals but we have municipalities that provide identification, benefits and sanctuary in violation of the law. We have business interests that make the argument they will be irreparably harmed by enforcing the law against them that is designed to protect the citizens of this nation and this nation’s sovereignty and these same frizz head judges consider this argument as valid. We prosecute and imprison law enforcement for doing their job and give immunity to the criminals while hiding their crimes from the jury to insure a politically correct conviction, We want our children to go to church and then punish them for acknowledging God in their schools but turn a blind eye to an illegal alien in that same school and instruct the administrators and teachers to don’t ask and don’t tell.

This will be the legacy we leave for our children if we don’t take a stand and do the right thing for the right reasons and issues. We need to show that same disappointment to our government that I saw in my Dad’s eyes and reflect it at the ballot box.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voting for Eternal Salvation

There was an article in the Chicago Tribune yesterday where the Catholic Bishops have drafted instructions to Catholics that their vote may determine their eternal salvation:

Tribune

I find this interesting that this church has escalated their policy of religion by intimidation. It wasn’t bad enough that they published the names of those that failed to meet their tithing commitment, played Russian roulette with the reproductive cycles of the Catholic women in lieu of birth control and granted annulments to couples that have already squirted out a family for the right price to save them from being excluded from the sacraments.

I long for the good old days where they stuck peoples’ heads in vices and popped out eyeballs or stretched their torsos on a Select Comfort rack in the name of God. “My rack number is 3…my rack number is 5…How many turns do you require to purge your soul of your sins? With the Select Comfort Numbers Rack your priest can dial your agony with ease. Its Pope approved!”

Now they want to put eternal damnation as a consequence for marking anything other than what’s church approved. Forget about the freedoms in this country that allow that voter to choose his denomination as well as the candidate or position on the ballot.

While we are on the subject of actions that determine your eternal salvation how would you reconcile hiding pedophile priests from the law? “Don’t worry my son…you have to pull your pants down so I can show you how much God loves you.” How do explain bouncing these sickos from parish to parish ultimately having to fork out the bucks to the victim’s families to compensate for their loss of innocence? “Hey Father, If you say you are God’s proctologist then why are both your hands on my shoulders during the exam? Be still my son.”

Here is but one more special interest group that proposes amnesty and open borders with the express intent of bolstering their coffers and their minions at the expense of the citizens of this nation.

People died to protect the privilege of being able to cast their vote and choose their government with out fear of reprisal, repression and intimidation. I find the Catholic Church’s actions reprehensible and they would be well reminded the separation of church and state if their coffer’s were subject to the Government’s fair share.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary is Most Elect Able?

I heard a poll on CNN this morning that the democrats of Nevada favor Hillary Clinton overwhelmingly. Not because she is honest, on the contrary;  it was stated that they felt she was the least honest of the bunch! No it was because she was the most elect able.

I pondered these statements and wondered if they really thought about what they were saying about the Nevada voters. Are they implying that they are blithering idiots and their only concern is who has the most money, the most commercials and the best PR firms doing damage control over her inability to address questions posed to her in a public forum. Surely the voters would be more concerned with the integrity and competence of the individual running for president than their “Elect ability.”

I won’t go over the past transgressions of Hillary and Bill, there are plenty people that are expressing their venom more eloquently than I on these issues. I will state that those voters need to look at who is behind Clinton backing her candidacy. She is supposed a friend of labor but promotes open borders and the invasion of this nation by cheap labor. She has the labor unions PAC money but look at their allegiance…AFLCIO stands for “A Freeloading Latino Criminal Invasion Organization.” Their members have dwindled so dramatically that their only concern is remaining solvent by organizing and collecting the dues from illegal immigrants. Those members that they have helped having their jobs outsourced by their actions have left the union membership in droves.

Can you trust one that waffles on any subject on a daily basis?

People complain about their elected officials but don’t take the time to research and show up at the polls electing the best person. There seems to be more concern about not getting blamed for the electorates’ decision and acknowledging they voted for that candidate. I look back at the last election and shiver at the field of prospective candidates and have seizures when I remember the ones selected were Bush and Kerry. Last election was a contest of the lesser of two evils and Jane Fonda and John Kerry won the election for Bush.

Well now is the time to make that decision! Instead of watching, “Dancing with the Stars” tune into “Talking to the Idiots.” Listen to someone explain why illegal aliens should get driver’s licenses and instate tuition when you have to pay full price for your American Citizen Child. Here them Justify why our borders are still wide open after 9/11 and why they think comprehensive amnesty is the solution to the illegal alien invasion.

I haven’t found the perfect candidate that represents my opinions but there is one that is a long shot by the main stream media’s standards. The longer I listen to Ron Paul the more I appreciate his candor and his honesty. I also appreciate that his support is constituent based instead of big business and special interests. Given if this election is another example of the lesser of two evils I’m not voting for one that represents the four letter word that contains 3 consonants and one vowel and is regarded as the most offensive term a woman can hear.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DHS…Derelict Hopeless Stooges!

There is something to be said for acting like or being brainless morons; people don’t expect you to do anything productive or be responsible for your actions. Here we have one of the largest law enforcement agencies that has the aura of total incompetence. They plead that they are under funded and understaffed but they say the answer to securing our country is comprehensive amnesty. Like this would really secure a port or border.

It has been by the grace of God and general good luck that we haven’t had another terrorist catastrophe but I wonder if that luck is about to change. I don’t know whether anyone else sees these glaring open invitations to create chaos and catastrophe by this departments lax security but I do. To make it even more apparent it is broadcast on the nightly news and plastered on the web for everyone to see. Now if Ahab the terrorist Arab has any snap whatsoever he would be making notes on all of the shortcomings of this agency and exploit their vulnerability. Some of these bastards can make a bomb out of a box of bisquick and yet we let illegal aliens run around the tarmac of one of the busiest airports in this nation. It doesn’t make sense. We are at war and we are more concerned that any action might offend some minority than to enforce the laws and security of this nation.

I find it more disturbing that there are no actions being taken to verify the rest of the nation’s airports and secure facilities. If this were an outbreak of a infectious disease then no expense or scrutiny would be spared. Every agency would initiate emergency procedures but a security violation of a major airport rates no response from the boot licking lackey that is in charge of this organization.

I expect in the near future Michael Chertoff will have to take the Nuremburg stance in a finger pointing session saying I was doing just what I was told. Congress will convene hearings about the next disaster feigning concern and contempt and just like “Brownie” they’ll find another scapegoat willing to fall on his sword to protect the one that has put corporate interests about the safety and welfare of the citizens of this nation.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary Has Short Heels

In my youth my friends and I spent a great deal of time eyeing the young ladies. We came up with all kinds of politically incorrect descriptions born from the raging levels of testosterone in our body’s chemistry. My favorite was, “I like her…she has short heels.” Depending on the company I kept at the time this usually prompted the query, “what do you mean by short heels?” I’d reply, “She’s apt to fall on her back when she sees money.”

Hillary Clinton is a lightening rod of controversy when it comes to money. Her substantial but suspicious campaign contributions from waiters, dishwashers and Asian Criminals reeks of impropriety but little is done to pursue investigating these contributions let alone prosecute criminal acts. She seems to squeak by the media’s attention either from having very intimidating friends, an undeclared clandestine support from their liberal agenda or she says she’ll return the money in question feigning ignorance. The question is how much has she kept that no one knows about?

I’ve stated before we have the best government that money can buy and that goes for the presidential candidates. It is greatly publicized what the candidates coffers contain in relation to the popularity of the candidate with the potential voters. I guess we are to assume that more money equals the best candidate irregardless of the candidate’s views and position on subjects of national interest. It is also deceiving that the corporate contributions are supposedly representing the views of the citizens. Face it people the only ones they represent are those corporations and the favors they expect if their supported candidate wins!

Hillary was bit recently by the subject of driver’s licenses for illegal aliens and one would question her motives when 80% of the populous of New York believes this is stupid idea and disagrees with this decision. Hillary pulls out the old Potomac propaganda trick that is verbose but sheds no public commitment on the subject one way or the other. She is pro-illegal immigrant depending on the audience but refuses to alienate those same voters that put her in office. Just as crime, disease and death excludes no one the corporate contributions are indiscriminate of party affiliation. They can afford to box their bet on win, place and show while we deal with the aftermath of a short heeled transaction!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »